The reflection on several instances only repeats the same objects and therefore can never give rise to a new idea.

At first sight this seems to serve but little to my purpose. I therefore enlarge my view to comprehend several instances where I find like objects always existing in like relations of contiguity and succession. In no one instance can I go any farther, nor is it possible for me to discover any third relation betwixt these objects.

I immediately perceive, that they are contiguous in time and place, and that the object we call cause precedes the other we call effect. When he sees one event occur, he will expect the other to occur as well: Hume says that if someone is used to always seeing the same things occur in the same order, he will get accustumed to them being in that order. From these properties, it is not apparent however that a man can suffocate in it. There is a third element, called force or necessity.The effect always comes after the cause.It is possible that causes far away have an effect close by, but they can only do this by a chain of cause-effect reactions.

Cause and effect must be located close to each other.Hume thinks that there are certain things all such relations of cause and effect have in common.: It is also essential that ontological causality does not suggest the temporal relation of before and after - between the cause and the effect that spontaneity (in nature) and chance (in the sphere of moral actions) are among the causes of effects belonging to the efficient causation, and that no incidental, spontaneous, or chance cause can be prior to a proper, real, or underlying cause per se.ДЄll investigations of causality coming later in history will consist in imposing a favorite hierarchy on the order (priority) of causes such as 'final > efficient > material > formal' (Aquinas), or in restricting all causality to the material and efficient causes or, to the efficient causality (deterministic or chance), or just to regular sequences and correlations of natural phenomena (the natural sciences describing how things happen rather than asking why they happen).Дavid Hume was another philosopher who looked at the relation between cause and effect. The same language refers to the effects of causes so that generic effects assigned to generic causes, particular effects to particular causes, and operating causes to actual effects. Both types of causes, can be spoken as potential or as actual, particular or generic. This includes modern ideas of causation, such as wanting or needing something to be, or those that give a purpose to behaviour Example: The reason why the artist wanted to make the statue.ДЄristotle told people of two types of causes: proper (prior) causes and accidental (chance) causes. The final cause, or telos, is the purpose of the thing. The final cause describes why something exists.Example: the artisan making the statue, the art of bronze-working, the man who gives the advice, the father of a child. It covers all possible types of things, and is the modern definition of cause. It shows ' what causes change of what is changed'. The efficient cause is that external thing that causes the change in the first place.This is sometimes called the whole-part causation. The formal cause tells us what, by using the example of an artist, a thing is planned to be.This is sometimes called the part-whole causation. The material cause is that 'raw material' from which a thing is made.Aristotle found different kinds of causes: to know a thing's nature is to know the reason why it is.' we have scientific knowledge when we know the cause.' In his books Posterior analytics and Metaphysics he wrote: He also looked at the problem of causality. 5.1 Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyД¬ausality in Philosophy Aristotle ДЄristotle was a Greek philosopher.

Final causality